MADISONCENTER FOR AMERICAN LEADERSHIP
Support our mission

An invitation to understand

The Constitution,
connected.

Start with a question. Follow a connection.
Discover the ideas that hold a republic together.

YOUR DOCUMENT. YOUR STARTING POINT.

There’s no right place to begin.
Choose something you’re curious about.
We’ll help you take the next step.

Begin with “We the People”
Save your learning

The constitutional text

Article I · Section 5

Select any highlighted phrase to understand what it means.

Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member. Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Source: National Constitution Center edition. Original wording is preserved; commentary explains historical and superseded provisions.

Sign in to save progress
Go at your own pace

You don’t have to understand everything at once. One connection is a good beginning.

LOOK A LITTLE CLOSER

Article I, Section 5, Clause 3 — publication

Publication with a secrecy exception

Current text
and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy;

What it means

The chamber must publish its journal from time to time, except for portions it judges require secrecy. The text combines a transparency duty with a limited recognition that some proceedings may need confidentiality.

Historical setting

The Confederation used a similar exception concerning matters such as diplomacy and military operations. The Constitution leaves the relevant judgment to each chamber rather than specifying an exhaustive list.

What it does

Citizens gain access to institutional records, although publication need not be instantaneous or complete in every detail. The power to withhold portions should be distinguished from abolishing the underlying duty to keep a journal.

Debate & interpretation

Secrecy may protect negotiations or safety, but it can also conceal error and misconduct. A responsible institution must explain and revisit confidentiality judgments where possible without defeating their legitimate purpose.

A common misreading

The exception does not say that all proceedings may remain permanently invisible whenever secrecy is politically convenient.

Think it through

What would distinguish a justified confidentiality decision from an effort to avoid public accountability?

Follow the connection

Sources & further reading

Original Madison Center commentary. Explanations distinguish the text, historical context, and interpretive disagreements.

Sign in to save