The constitutional text

Article I · Section 5

Select any highlighted phrase to understand what it means.

Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member. Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

Source: National Constitution Center edition. Original wording is preserved; commentary explains historical and superseded provisions.

Go at your own pace

You don’t have to understand everything at once. One connection is a good beginning.

LOOK A LITTLE CLOSER

Article I, Section 5, Clause 3 — journal

An official record of proceedings

Current text
Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings,

What it means

Each chamber must keep a journal of its proceedings. The duty creates an institutional record of what the chamber does rather than leaving its actions entirely to memory or private reporting.

Historical setting

The Articles also required a journal and provided for publication. The Constitution carries that accountability device into the new two-chamber legislature.

What it does

A journal supplies evidence of formal proceedings and can support public oversight. It is not necessarily a word-for-word transcript of everything said, which is a different kind of record.

Debate & interpretation

Recordkeeping makes official action traceable but still requires decisions about what detail to record. The neighboring publication and recorded-vote provisions add further accountability without requiring identical documentation of every moment.

A common misreading

The constitutional Journal should not automatically be equated with a verbatim transcript or with every modern publication reporting congressional debate.

Think it through

Which details are necessary for citizens to determine what their representatives actually did?

Follow the connection

Sources & further reading

Original Madison Center commentary. Explanations distinguish the text, historical context, and interpretive disagreements.

Sign in to save